distributed-solarIn discussions, regarding the merits of distributed solar power too little focus has been given to the many important benefits that result from increasing the use of distributed solar power. These benefits accrue to both the utilities and presumably their rate payers as well and to society (and the tax payers) at large. This post summarizes a recent paper “Solar Power Generation in the US: Too expensive, or a bargain?” that attempts to give these benefits a tangible quantified value in order that the debate on the merits of solar power also begin to include this side of the cost / benefit analysis. A side that is all too often glossed over and largely overlooked.

by Chris de Morsella, Green Economy Post Chris is the co-editor of The Green Executive Recruiter Directory. Follow Chris on Twitter @greeneconpost

Ask most people about the cost of solar power and they will tell you that it costs much more than electricity from the grid. Even people who support the idea of renewable energy and understand why it is important to wean our society off of its addiction to fossil energy will “admit” that solar energy is still much more costly than the average cost for electric energy on the national grid. They may follow on by pointing out how rapidly it is coming down in cost – especially solar PV – in order to focus on the future price trend perspective, but even ardent solar advocates will admit that as things stand today it still costs quite a bit more than cheaper fossil energy alternatives.

The skeptics and those who, for whatever reason motivates them, are downright hostile towards the very notion of renewable energy – these people do exist – will use this to argue that solar energy remains a remote niche energy supplier that is not ready for prime time and will not be ready for many years.

A related post “Solar Price Parity Achievable by Streamlining Cost of Permitting“, explores streamlining the building code process for solar installation could help rooftop solar reach price parity with the grid.

And at first glance, by looking at the average unit cost of grid connected solar power this argument seems to hold water. Even though, I count myself as a pretty vocal supporter of solar power and renewable energy in general, and I am one of those who often points out how rapidly the cost structures for solar power (and especially for solar PV) have been falling the fact remains that in most areas solar still costs quite a bit more per unit of energy than the average unit price on the grid.

But is this grid parity gap as large as it seems at first glance. When the total value that solar power deliver to utilities’ rate payers and society’s tax payers is calculated it adds up to a pretty significant number, and one that is currently being left off of the table in the debate over the merits or non-merits of renewable energy versus continued reliance on fossil energy sources. For example in the state of New York these benefits, to ratepayers and taxpayers add up to between 15 to 40 cents per kWh.

Factoring in these indirect benefits, such as prevention of environmental harm that would have resulted from say an equivalent energy produced from coal, fuel price mitigation, outage risk protection, and so forth and helping a wider audience of people develop an appreciation of them provides a good economic justification for the existence of payment structures (often referred to as incentives) that transfer value from those who benefit from solar electric generation to those who invest in solar electric generation.

A new paper “Solar Power Generation in the US: Too expensive, or a bargain?”, by Richard Perez, ASRC at the University of Albany; Ken Zweibel, GW Solar Institute, George Washington University; and Thomas E. Hoff, Clean Power Research makes this argument quantifying these values for the New York region, which is not exactly the sunniest part of the country. Even though the paper is focused on the New York regional market and its cost benefit analysis is based on data from that region its conclusions are more generally applicable and similar arguments can be made elsewhere in other regional markets.

The paper begins by noting that the potential capacity of solar energy is vast and that solar power tends to be a load following energy source, which means that it tends to produce most when energy is most needed. For example peak electrical demand is often driven by commercial daytime air conditioning (A/C) in much of the US, which is also when most solar energy is available. This is especially evident during summer heat waves, which produce the most extreme peak demand conditions the grid needs to handle and have led to spectacular large regional blackouts.

The fact that solar power works best precisely when distributed power is most needed has huge implications. For example the August 2003 Northeast blackout that lasted several days and that caused nearly $8 billion in economic damages was indirectly caused by a peak in demand for AC, fueled by an oppressive regional heat wave. It has been estimated that as little as 500 MW of distributed PV region‐wide would have kept every single cascading failure from feeding into one another and precipitating the historic blackout, saving the region’s economies the $8 billion in economic losses that they instead had to endure. A post mortem analysis of a similar subcontinent sized blackout in the Western US a few years before led to nearly identical conclusions.

Performing a Cost Benefit Analysis for Distributed Solar Power Generation

The paper looks at the cost/benefit picture for solar electric generation beginning by pointing out that there are three relevant parties that are involved in either paying for the solar power capacity or that receive quantifiable benefits from said capacity. The authors identify three relevant parties
The relevant parties in this analysis are:

1) The investor/developer who purchases/builds a solar power plant;

2) The utility and its ratepayers who purchase the energy produced by the plant;

3) The society at large and its taxpayers who contribute via public R&D and tax‐based incentives and receive benefits from the plant.

It is a mistake to view this energy cost/value transaction as a one‐sided affair that only benefits the investor/developer whose return on investment – e.g., the necessary 20‐30 cents breakeven cash flow‐equivalent for distributed PV ‐‐ is forced upon the two other parties by various incentives and subsidies. In reality the other parties, the utilities and rate payers and society at large also are beneficiaries who also receive tangible and measurable value from distributed solar electric generation.

What Are the Benefits of Solar Power that are not being counted in the Cost Benefit Equations?

Following are some of the quantifiable benefits provided by distributed solar to rate payers and utilities:

• Transmission (wholesale) energy cost saving, 6‐11 ¢/kWh: In New York State, the value of transmission energy avoided by locally delivered solar energy ranged from 6 to 11 cents per kWh. This represents the savings accrued by energy generated locally by solar systems, which is energy that does not need to be purchased on the wholesale markets at the Locational‐based Marginal Pricing (LMP).

• Transmission capacity, 0‐5 ¢/kWh: PV installations can deliver the equivalent of capacity, displacing the need to purchase this capacity elsewhere. The paper notes that the effective capacity credit of low penetration PV in metropolitan New York can reliably displace an annual demand response expense of $60 per installed solar kW, i.e., amounting to 4.5 cents per produced solar KWh.

• Distribution energy (loss savings), 0‐1 ¢/kWh: Because distributed solar plants can be sited very close to the load within the distribution system — as close as the roof in many cases, they displace electrical losses incurred when energy transits from power plants; losses that are in addition to transmission energy losses.

• Distribution capacity, 0‐3 ¢/kWh: Distributed solar generation that is situated close to centers of load can also reduce the wear and tear of the utility’s equipment – e.g., transformers ‐‐ as well as allowing the them to defer upgrades.

• Fuel price mitigation, 3‐5 ¢/kWh: Distributed solar power once installed requires no fuel in order to keep running. Its fuel is the sun. PV generation is a hedge against fluctuating fossil energy prices, which can and has been quantified.

In addition to these benefits accruing to utilities (and indirectly to rate payers, if these savings are in fact passed on) there are additional benefits that distributed solar power delivers to the society at large and to its tax payers:

• Grid security enhancement, 2‐3 ¢/kWh: In much of the US solar power closely aligns with peak demand. Because of this distributed solar energy near point of use — roof top solar PV for example — can deliver effective capacity, and therefore reduce the risk of the power outages and rolling blackouts that are caused by high demand and by the resulting stresses on the transmission and distribution systems. When the grid goes down advanced economies suffer enormous loss, a cost that is born across the entire economy. Distributed capacity, which can reliably deliver power during when it is needed most, can prevent huge losses that would have otherwise occurred. This is clearly of considerable benefit to society at large and to the tax payers as well and it can be calculated.

• Environment/health, 3‐6 ¢/kWh: It is well established that the environmental footprint of solar generation – both PV and CSP — is very much smaller than that of the fossil fuel or nuclear technologies.

• Long Term Societal Value, 3‐4 ¢/kWh: A measure of the long term finite fuel hedge value of solar generation from a societal point of view.

• Economic growth, 3+ ¢/kWh: Experience in Germany and Ontario — regions experiencing rapid growth in new solar power capacity — shows that solar energy sustains more jobs per kWh than conventional energy does. Growing the local employment base leads to increased local tax revenues, lower unemployment and better business and social conditions in general.

The paper this post summarizes goes into much greater detail and more depth; I suggest that interested people follow the link to “Solar Power Generation in the US: Too expensive, or a bargain?”. It is intuitively clear to many people that distributed solar power brings many benefits to society; that it is more sustainable and environmentally sound than fossil or nuclear alternatives. This paper attempts to enumerate and quantify these benefits and in so doing provides a powerful argument for why many of us feel so good about solar power.

Our related post “DOE SunShot Initiative Aims for Cost Competitive Solar Energy by 2020“, looks at this DOE program that aims to spur innovations and rationalizations that will together slash the total system cost of solar photovoltaic systems by three quarters within this decade.

Featured Resource:
Biomass-Power-ThermalBiomass Power & Thermal --- Biomass Power & Thermal is a monthly trade publication tailored for industry professionals engaged in utilizing biomass for the generation of electricity, thermal energy, or both (CHP). In addition to policy, regulation, project finance, technology and plant management, the publication maintains a core editorial focus on biomass logistics: generating, cultivating, collecting, transporting, processing, marketing, procuring and utilizing sustainable biomass for power and heat. Request Your Complimentary Subscription NOW!>>

© 2011, Chris de Morsella. All rights reserved. Do not republish.

Line Break

Author: Chris de Morsella (146 Articles)

After a decade performing as a lead guitarist for rock bands, Chris de Morsella decided to return to the career his uncle mentored him in as a youth....Software Engineering. Since that time he has thrown himself into his work. He has designed a compound document publishing architecture for regulatory submissions capable of handling very large multi-document FDA regulatory drug approval submissions, for Liquent, a division of Thompson Publishing. At the Associated Press, Chris worked with senior editors at facilities around the world, to develop a solution for replacing existing editorial systems with an integrated international content management solution. He lead the design effort at Microsoft for a help system for mobile devices designed to provide contextual help for users. Chris also helped to develop the web assisted installer for LifeCam2.0, the software for Microsoft’s web cam and developed late breaking features for the product He also served with the Rhapsody client team to redesign and build a major new release of Real Networks Rhapsody client product. His most recent assignment has been Working with the Outlook Mobile Time Management team for the next release of Outlook Mobile for the SmartPhone. Chris' interests are in green building and architecture, smart grid, the cloud, geo-thermal energy, solar energy, smart growth, organic farming and permaculture. Follow Chris on Twitter.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Konsyltacii-Analytics/100002672775120 Konsyltacii Analytics


    Do not believe those who say that investing in”green” industry are unprofitable. It is extremely profitable for the producer and investor in the absence a high cost of a technologies. However, huge amounts of money being spent on new technology. But a users  a same solar panels pay a huge
    price for them. But look at the device a same of solar panels, what it is made, what materials need to manufacture solar panels and photovoltaic cells, and you’ll realize that “green” technology – is not only good for the environment, but also extremely profitable for the investor and the manufacturer, and for the consumer, and the environment. This is – a profitable business, not charity! Smart people will immediately recognize where to invest. Good when the cost is almost minimal, and profits – are very high.


    Не верьте тем, кто говорит, что инвестиции в “зеленую” промышленность неприбыльны. Это является сверхприбыльным для производителя и инвестора при отсутствии больших затрат на технологию. Однако огромные деньги тратятся на новые технологии. Но пользователи тех же солнечных панелей платят огромную цену за них. Однако посмотрите устройство солнечной панели, из чего она состоит, какие материалы идут на производство солнечных
    панелей и фотоэлементов и Вы поймете, что “зеленые” технологии – это не только полезно для окружающей среды, но и сверхприбыльно и для инвестора,  и для производителя, и для потребителя, и для окружающей среды. Это –  выгодный бизнес, а не благотворительность!
    Умные люди сразу поймут куда инвестировать. Хорошо когда затраты почти минимальны, а прибыль – очень высокая.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Konsyltacii-Analytics/100002672775120 Konsyltacii Analytics


    Ukraine has great scientific potential. And the cost of scientific development is many times cheaper than in many countries. Some scientific achievements are unique, exclusive and potentially extremely profitable.  The law of competition: who is the first of a investors and manufacturers understand their profit, he will take advantage of the unique Ukrainian scientific,
    technological and commercial achievements.


    Украина имеет большой научный потенциал. А стоимость научных разработок во много раз дешевле , чем во многих странах. Некоторые научные достижения являются уникальными, эксклюзивными и потенциально сверхприбыльными. Действует закон конкуренции:  кто первым из инвесторов и производителей поймет свою прибыль, тот и воспользуется украинскими уникальными научно-коммерческими и инженерными достижениями.