This post examines the importance of successfully communicating the importance of sustainability for the bottom line, in terms of risk mitigation, value opportunities and business benefits associated with sustainability to an organization’s CFO. The CFO is typically ultimately responsible for investor relations, facilities, purchasing, human resources, IT and have a large impact on all organizational resource allocation decision making in general, and CFOs can have a major impact on the ultimate success or failure of an organizations sustainability programs.
by Christopher Gleadle, author of Sustainable Growth Through Sustainable Business, and senior partner at the CMG Consultancy a sustainability performance agency. Follow Christopher on Twitter @cmgconsultancy; connect with Christopher on Linkedin; connect with him on Facebook.
It is typical in organizations for the CFO to be ultimately responsible for investor relations, facilities, purchasing, human resources and IT. Moreover, CFOs have a unique vantage of operations, by seeing it from a purely financial paradigm. And, therefore, many of the business risks and opportunities exposed through a coherent sustainability strategy involve teams who lie under the ultimate control of the CFO. Yet, research shows CFOs who do not feel the pressure for a sustainability strategy from the CEO are left feeling underwhelmed by the sustainability agenda – which exposes a paradox.
Meanwhile, investor pressure towards sustainability is ever increasing. In a 2009 CDP report of investors, 77% of respondents factor climate change information into investment decisions, citing “carbon risk” and “potential regulation” as motivation. These results are very much in line with the Tru Cost report, Carbon Risks in UK Equity Funds, which stated “assessment of future corporate value is directly proportional to carbon and sustainability reporting and management.” Sustainability has become a major protector for companies against rising costs, damage to brand and reputation, existing and future environmental legal mandates as well as shifting customer and market expectation.
And, while there are deep concerns if there is poor or non-existent integrated reporting, the ability to report is a signal to stakeholders that the issues of sustainability are being taken seriously and provide accountability for stakeholders to track progress, adding value to the business.
In the long view, environmental social governance (ESG) is driving improvements towards the triple bottom line – economical, social and environmental. From a point of view of risk mitigation and secure financial growth, socially and environmentally astute companies are grasping the opportunities.
“Climate risk can have a real impact on portfolio holdings. There is a growing case for trustees to attain some level of knowledge around these issues, and take steps to mitigate any negative consequences for not taking action,” according to a recent report issued as a guide for British Pension Fund Trustees.
Disturbingly, SMEs are four times more likely to do nothing. This is typically because CFOs see sustainability as a cost, and cite resource constraints. This is due mainly to a lack of understanding of the risk mitigation, value opportunities and business benefits associated with sustainability, therefore not making it part of future strategy. This view is supported by sector associations in the PwC, CDP, DEFRA Review of the Contribution to GHG Emissions Reductions and Associated Costs and Benefits report.
However, as customers shift to reducing risk of environmental and social exposure of their supply chain, CFOs and other executives are going to have to fundamentally review the way they look at their business and value chain to remain vital. Thus, as CFOs become used to the balancing act of profit and the credo of sustainability being connected, and make environmental considerations accountable, treating them with the same level of transparency as the financial metrics, it makes the process of tracking true costs and benefits across the organization, its assets and operational activities, easier. This is the natural home for accountants – to confirm accuracy and credibility.
This leads to environmental planning and strategic planning working together in understanding what the year ahead and long-term view looks like in terms of accountability lifecycle and delivering clear key performance indicators and budgets. Additionally, it protects the company from poorly measured random environmental projects and creates a sustained process of intended actions, clear outcomes and business benefits. In addition, improvements in operational efficiencies and the achievement of cost savings will free up capital for re- investment into new technologies. Yet, while investment in low-carbon technologies will help reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, to optimize such investments, the procurement of such technologies must be linked to a company wide sustainability strategy, holistically linking organizational processes to these new technologies. Such strategies will – and are – rewarding companies that deliver more efficient products and services supporting the efficiency, and reducing the environmental exposure of their customers.
Moreover, there has been a great deal of research completed which shows sustainability improves motivation, lowers staff turnover and is a driver for attracting and retaining the best people, delivering further financial benefits, through improved team cohesion, as the team will always surpass the contribution of the individual. Everyone pulling together fosters a wholly more stable and rewarding culture. The higher emphasis on nurturing and developing team cohesion will improve and go beyond customer expectation and enhance the customer experience – whilst driving important innovation of new products and services enhancing market share.
“Leading companies recognize that successful sustainability performance translates to successful bottom-line business performance, and investors are attracted to companies that act in a sustainable manner with a focus on long-term profitability and competitive advantage,” says Jessica Fries, Director, The Prince’s Accounting for Sustainability Project (A4S).
Given the sight of all areas of responsibility of the CFO in relation to resource management and sustainability, there is an emphasis on margin improvements through cost savings and increased competitiveness. Additionally, sustainability offers risk mitigation against the failure to disclose environmental risk, and thus, protection against reputation damage and against gaining poor peer rankings in investor research.
In our related post: “CEOs See Sustainability as Engine for Growth but Industry Sectors Split on Priorities“, we examine the major differences that exist in the perceptions of sustainability between CEOs in different industry sectors, as well as significant gaps in the level of integration of sustainability already achieved in their companies.
Secondly, CFOs will gain greater insight of energy and resource expenditure.
Capital requests would now include energy and resource consumption, enabling the ability to apply whole life cost analysis of asset ownership and initiating post project measurement and verification, critical to delivering confidence in current and future energy and resource project savings claims.
CFOs must connect with energy management and sustainability teams, moving from isolated teams to pervasive aspects of all critical business functions, thus, maintaining robustness in verification and substantiation of developed KPIs and associated metrics. This in turn will create visibility and inclusion of sustainability into core business practices and accountability processes.
Ultimately, sustainability throws a spotlight on the opportunities for cutting costs, creating innovation, improving differentiation and the ability to compete, while helping to mitigate risks from supply chain, costs, tax, legal and resource.
It is the responsibility of the CFO and their accounting teams to provide the best systems and information, acting with the long-term in mind. The point surely is that serving the best interests of the environment and communities can also be seen to be the right financial approach.
© 2011, Christopher Gleadle. All rights reserved. Do not republish.